“I want trade that strengthens America’s middle class and creates jobs.” – Sen. Sherrod Brown We shouldn’t give fast-track authority for more NAFTA-style deals if we can’t guarantee a level playing field for U.S. workers and manufacturers. And we shouldn’t greenlight the Trans-Pacific Partnership if we can’t guarantee that China won’t be able to gain…
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has been the public face of the Democratic Party’s feud with President Barack Obama over his trade agenda. But behind the scenes, Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) quietly united his party behind a strategy that resulted in a major defeat Tuesday for the president.
Brown’s weeks of work came to fruition when Democrats voted to block legislation that would have given Obama so-called fast-track trade authority. Fast-track authority would strip Congress of the ability to amend trade deals negotiated by the president and is essential for the passage of Obama’s Trans-Pacific Partnership, a trade deal the administration is negotiating with 11 Pacific nations.
Sen. Christopher Coons sat with President Obama in the Oval Office last week for an hour, and met with him again Monday. But in the end, it was another Democrat who closed the deal with Coons on a high-stakes trade bill: Sen. Sherrod Brown.
Despite Obama’s personal lobbying, Coons voted Tuesday with every other Democrat except one—fellow Delaware Sen. Tom Carper—against moving forward to debate one of Obama’s most significant economic proposals, a legislative package paving the way for one of the largest free trade agreements in history. The reason? An argument from Brown, a fierce antagonist to the president on trade.
Each day, workers across the country face impossible dilemmas. Do they go into work knowing the risks to their own health and to others around them, or do they stay home and lose a paycheck? Do they send a sick child to school, knowing they’re risking the health of their daughter and her entire classroom,…
Because Ohio’s constitution does not allow same sex couples to marry, Jim Obergefell and his husband, John Arthur, had to travel out of state to tie the knot. But after John passed away, the state of Ohio refused to honor their marriage.
Jim fought back, and on April 28th his case will be heard in the Supreme Court.
Earlier this month, I had the privilege to meet with Jim. And he told me what he tells everyone who will listen — he wants his marriage to be recognized and for the simple human right to marry the person he loves.
For Jim, this case is personal. But for the country, his case could represent the opportunity to legalize full marriage equality in all 50 states.
Cleveland.com: With corporate and labor interests watching, Sherrod Brown has 88 amendments for this week’s foreign-trade deal
U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown has as many amendments to the long-awaited fast-track trade deal this week as Ohio has counties: 88.
No other lawmaker is likely to have as many demands to address child and forced labor, currency manipulation, foreign workplace and environmental standards and help for American workers who lose jobs when their work moves overseas.
It’s unclear if Senate Finance Committee leaders will let Brown offer all 88 amendments. They have scheduled a meeting Wednesday to discuss the pending legislation, mark it up with changes where there is agreement, and vote. Then the matter will move on to the full Senate and, later, the House. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, foreign governments, manufacturing interests, major global corporations and big labor will be watching.
U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown is joining a Cincinnati resident fighting for marriage equality before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The senator from Ohio sat down with Jim Obergefell in Washington, D.C.
Obergefell is there preparing for his case to be heard by the Supreme Court in about two weeks.
He’s fighting to have his name on his spouse’s death certificate.